That is an excerpt from Dignity in Motion: Borders, Our bodies and Rights.
Get your free download from E-International Relations.

The Worldwide Prison Court docket (ICC) has had an open investigation in Libya since 2011, following a unanimous referral by the United Nations Safety Council (UNSC) (ICC, 2011). The investigation has concerned prices that embody crimes towards humanity (homicide, imprisonment, torture, persecution, and different inhumane acts) (ICC, 2011).On 8 Might 2017, the Prosecutor of the ICC, Fatou Bensouda, instructed the UNSC that her workplace was analyzing the feasibility of opening an investigation into migrant-related crimes in Libya (ICC 2017). Crimes towards humanity, as per the Rome Statute of the Worldwide Prison Court docket, means any of the next acts when dedicated as a part of a widespread or systematic assault directed towards any civilian inhabitants with information of the assault: homicide, extermination, enslavement, deportation or forcible switch of inhabitants, imprisonment, torture, rape and different types of sexual violence, persecution, enforced disappearance, the crime of apartheid, and different inhumane acts (ICC 1998).

Within the context of widespread and systematic crimes dedicated towards migrants in Libya, the European Union (EU) and its member states proceed to collaborate with the North African nation to cease migration to the EU through the Central Mediterranean. Since 2014, the EU has not had an lively search and rescue mission for migrants at sea making an attempt to flee from Libya (Pillai 2019). As an alternative, the present coverage consists of pushing migrants and refugees again to the North African nation by coaching and funding the Libyan Coast Guard (LCG) to intercept migrants, which find yourself in detention facilities in Libya (Pillai 2019). Students Itamar Mann, Violeta Moreno-Lax, and Omer Shatz have gone one step additional and requested for the position of the EU to be scrutinized (Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018). They state that ‘helping, coaching, or funding organs of nations that disregard human rights might set off worldwide duty'(Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018). Furthermore, they argue, no help or help needs to be supplied in a context of gross and systematic human rights violations if it might probably contribute to sustaining the established order (Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018).

To this point, the difficulty of the EU and its member states’ involvement in Libya has been largely mentioned by way of state duty and human rights violations. Nevertheless, influential observers, and even French President Emmanuel Macron, said that trafficking within the North African nation has change into against the law towards humanity (Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018). Inside this surroundings, claims demanding an investigation of the EU’s involvement in crimes towards migrants in Libya got here to fruition with a Communication to the Workplace of the Prosecutor of the ICC in 2019 (Shatz and Branco 2019). Invoking Article 15 of the Rome Statute, referring to the initiation of proprio motu investigation, Omer Shatz and Juan Branco, legal professionals and professors on the Paris Institute of Political Research, also referred to as Sciences Po, alleged that 1000’s of deaths and different ‘crimes towards humanity’ had been dedicated as a direct results of EU coverage. Of their communication, Shatz and Branco talk about a number of modes of legal responsibility that might emerge from the EU’s insurance policies in Libya and the Mediterranean (Shatz and Branco 2019). All of the above requires a must assess the implications of the EU’s collaboration with Libya, not as a world group however as a person agent.

The goal of this chapter is to evaluate if particular person felony duty can emerge on account of border externalization insurance policies in Libya, solely for aiding and abetting crimes towards humanity towards migrants. The primary part of the chapter will look into the widespread and systematic crimes that migrants face in Libya and its alleged perpetrators. The second part will analyze the related authorized facets of aiding, abetting, and in any other case helping crimes towards humanity. The third part will critically analyze the EU’s insurance policies and collaboration with Libya, maintaining in thoughts the 2 most important components of felony duty: the psychological and materials components. The final part will assess if these insurance policies might set off the ICC’s jurisdiction and what challenges might come up.

Crimes towards Migrants and Border Externalization Insurance policies

As early as in 2011, when the ICC opened its investigation for crimes towards humanity in Libya, the Worldwide Group for Migration (IOM) issued an alarm after gathering testimonies of trafficking victims in Libya, which they outlined as a ‘torture archipelago’ (UN Information 2017).  Additionally in 2011, the Panel of Consultants on Libya, along with the United Nations Help Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), reported that from the second migrants enter Libya, they change into subjected to illegal killings, torture and different ill-treatment, arbitrary detention and illegal deprivation of liberty, rape and different types of sexual and gender-based violence, slavery and compelled labor, and extortion and exploitation by armed teams, traffickers, smugglers, personal events, police, the Libyan Coast Guard (LCG), and the Division for Combating Unlawful Migration (UNSC 2017).

In August 2017, Agnes Callamard, United Nations Particular Rapporteur on extrajudicial, abstract, or arbitrary executions submitted a report concerning illegal deaths of migrants and refugees (UNGA 2017). One of many violations Callamard addresses is the risk posed to migrants ensuing from border externalization insurance policies, which might quantity to aiding and helping within the deprivation of life and the failure to forestall foreseeable deaths or different violations (UNGA 2017, 2). In the identical report, Callamard detailed how border externalization insurance policies, together with ‘helping, funding, or coaching businesses in different nations to arrest, element, course of, rescue, or disembark and return refugees or migrants’ raised severe considerations the place the recipient states are alleged to be accountable for severe crimes (UNGA 2017, 10–36). She goes on to comment that, by ‘funding and coaching businesses that commit these abuses, funding States are probably aiding and helping lack of life’ (UNGA 2017, 11–37). One yr later, in 2018, Nils Melzer, the United Nations Particular Rapporteur on torture and different merciless, inhuman, or degrading remedy or punishment echoed Callamard’s findings and said that ‘for probably the most half, these violations observe a programmatic sample that may be described as systematic’ (UNGA 2017, 16–58)

Violeta Moreno-Lax and Mariagiulia Giuffré clarify how the EU-Libya cooperation, each at sea and on land, and the Italy-Libya memorandum of understanding (MoU) are examples of these migration containment insurance policies (Moreno-Lax and Giuffre 2017). Moreno-Laz and Giuffré outline these insurance policies as types of ‘contactless management’ which, distant from continental Europe, current new challenges to find out tasks (Moreno-Lax and Giuffre 2017). The technique launched in 2016 by the EU has transferred all efficient administration to Libyan brokers, aiming to elude all potentialities of worldwide obligation (Moreno-Lax and Giuffre 2017).Nevertheless, in his 2018 report back to the UN Human Rights Council, Melzer affirmed that these insurance policies of ‘contactless management’ would possibly set off the ICC’s jurisdiction (UNGA 2018).

Aiding, Abetting, and In any other case Aiding

Aiding, abetting, and in any other case helping is a mode of legal responsibility in worldwide felony regulation, based mostly on holding a person criminally accountable for against the law, even when that particular person will not be immediately accountable to having dedicated the act (Vij 2013). While the Rome Statute doesn’t strictly outline aiding and abetting, advert hoc tribunals have unanimously outlined a person responsible for aiding and abetting as ‘an individual who deliberate, instigated, ordered, dedicated, or in any other case aided and abetted within the planning, preparation, or execution of against the law’ (United Nations 1993). ‘Aiding’ usually refers to bodily help, and ‘abetting’ is used to seek advice from a type of encouragement or persuasion (Vij 2013).

Probably the most difficult a part of analyzing this mode of particular person felony duty is to find out its minimal necessities (Ambos 2013). There appears to be a common settlement on two most important necessities: actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus is the ‘felony act’ (the bodily/materials factor), whereas mens rea refers back to the ‘felony intent’ (the ‘psychological factor’) (Knoops 2014). Concerning the fabric factor, jurisprudence beneath the Worldwide Prison Court docket calls for that the acts dedicated by the person have to be particularly directed to help, encourage, or lend ethical assist to the fee of the crime (Vij 2013, 159). Most significantly, this assist have to be ‘substantial’ for the perpetration of the crime (Vij 2013, 35). So as to discover the person liable, the individual will need to have aided or abetted earlier than, throughout, or after the crime was being dedicated (Vij 2013, 35). You will need to spotlight that the help can both be an act or omission, and there aren’t any geographical or temporal limitations to it (Vij 2013, 35).

Beneath the jurisdiction of the Worldwide Court docket of Justice (ICJ), Article 16 of the draft articles of the Duty of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts of the Worldwide Regulation Fee (ILC) describes aiding and abetting as the next:

A State which aids or assists one other State within the fee of an internationally wrongful act by the latter is internationally accountable for doing so if (Worldwide Regulation Fee 2001):

(a) that State does so with information of the circumstances of the internationally wrongful act; and

(b) the act can be internationally wrongful if dedicated by that State.

Even when the ILC draft articles usually are not binding, students James C. Hathaway and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen argue that Article 16 has generated ‘huge assist as a matter of state follow and opinio juris‘ (Gammeltoft-Hansen and Hathaway 2014). Whereas there’s not actual definition of what an motion should quantity to for it to suit with the definition of ‘substantial contribution’, case regulation defines it as a ‘contribution that in actual fact has an impact on the fee of the crime’ (United Nations 2000). However, beneath ICC jurisprudence, there is no such thing as a point out of a necessity for ‘substantial’ assist for the perpetration of the crime. Subparagraph (c) of Article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute offers with the contribution that should exist for an individual to be responsible for aiding and abetting, and it defines it as an individual that ‘for the aim of facilitating the fee of such against the law, aids, abets, or in any other case assists in its fee or its tried fee, together with offering the means for its fee’ (ICC, 1998). In line with scholar Kai Ambos, the truth that ‘in any other case helping’ was added as a mode of particular person felony duty appears to ivolve a fair decrease threshold (Ambos 2013, 14). Nonetheless, Ambos concludes, one ought to think about the substantial impact of the help to the crime as an unbiased constituting factor of modes of legal responsibility (Ambos 2013, 14).

The second requirement to assign legal responsibility is the psychological factor. In case regulation produced by the Worldwide Prison Tribunal for the previous Yugoslavia (ICTY), the mens rea for aiding and abetting circumstances has remained ‘information’ (Vij 2013, 158). ‘Information’ has been outlined as being conscious or having information that the acts or omissions are certainly helping within the fee of against the law by the direct perpetrator (Vij 2013, 158). Furthermore, since mens rea is outlined as information, it isn’t even needed for the aider and abetter to have the identical intent as the principle perpetrator (Vij 2013, 158). Usually, the aider-abettor should solely pay attention to the fundamental components of the principle perpetrator’s crimes to be able to fulfill the psychological factor (Vij 2013, 159). However, to be liable beneath the ICC’s jurisdiction, the person should act with the intent to facilitate the crime, know, or want that his conduct will facilitate the fee of the crime (Vij 2013, 159).

Ambos explains that the wording within the Rome Statute suggests a threshold that goes past the extraordinary mens rea requirement (Ambos 2013, 15). In Article 25(3) it says that the aider-abettor should act ‘for the aim of facilitating the fee of the crime’ (ICC 1998). In line with Ambos, the time period ‘objective’ extends past the mere definition of information (Ambos 2013, 15). The world ‘facilitating’ although, confirms that substantial help will not be a necessary situation of the principle crime (Ambos 2013, 53).

EU-Libya Cooperation: Externalizing Obligations

On 3 and 11 October 2013, two shipwrecks occurred close to Lampedusa, Italy, inflicting the loss of life of 636 individuals (Tazzioli 2016). A number of days after the shipwrecks, Italy launched a military-humanitarian operation referred to as Mare Nostrum, with the principle goal of rescuing migrants in misery at sea (Tazzioli 2016). Mare Nostrum managed to save lots of over 150,000 individuals in a single yr and prevented 2,000 to three,000 migrants from disappearing within the Central Mediterranean (Eisinger 2015). Italy then requested the EU to assist their efforts and contribute to their life-saving efforts, however most nations refused as a result of they thought-about Mare Nostrum a pull-factor for unlawful immigration (Eisinger 2015). The Italian-led search and rescue mission formally resulted in November 2014, when it was changed by Triton, a joint EU operation coordinated by Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Company (Tazzioli 2016). Nevertheless, Triton modified its focus from rescuing refugees and migrants at sea to being solely about border management and stopping unlawful crossings (Tazzioli 2016).

2016 marked a report of refugees and migrants making an attempt to succeed in Europe through the Central Mediterranean route (European Fee 2017). The yr 2016 was additionally a report yr for the variety of lives misplaced at sea: over 4,500 individuals drowned within the try to cross (European Fee 2017). Since then, the EU has intensified efforts to forestall migrants and refugees from reaching Europe from Libya (Human Rights Watch 2019). EU establishments and member states have invested tens of millions of euros to enhance the capability of the Tripoli-based Authorities of Nationwide Accord (GNA), to forestall migrants from fleeing Libya by boat and detain them in detention centres (Human Rights Watch 2019).

Italy has additionally taken the lead in offering materials help and coaching to the LCG and have handed onto them the duty of coordinating rescue operations to be able to enhance the variety of interceptions (Human Rights Watch 2019). Nevertheless, the Panel of Consultants on Libya defined in a report back to the UNSC that the LCG has not been notified as a part of the safety forces beneath the management of the GNA, and the difficulty of management is additional highlighted by a number of stories of felony actions involving LCG (UNSC 2017, 41). Migrants have recounted harmful, life-threatening interceptions by armed males believed to be from the LCG (UNSC 2017). After being introduced again to Libyan shores, migrants are sometimes overwhelmed, robbed, and brought to detention facilities or personal homes and farms, the place they’re subjected to compelled labor, rape, and different sexual violence (UNSC 2017).

In January 2017, the European Fee despatched a communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council titled ‘Migration on the Central Mediterranean route: Managing flows, saving lives’ (European Fee 2017). In that communication, the Fee set out the principle targets to, firstly, ramp up coaching for the LCG to autonomously conduct search and rescue (together with disembarkation) in Libyan waters and, secondly, to strengthen Libya’s southern border (within the Sahara Desert) to hinder irregular actions by Libya and into Europe (Moreno-Lax and Guiffre 2017). The EU had already began a coaching program for LCG officers, with a deal with the interdiction of migrant boats (Moreno- Lax and Mariagiulia 2017).

In parallel, in February 2017, the Italian Prime Minister and the Head of the Nationwide Reconciliation Authorities of the Libya State signed an MoU to inter alia sort out border safety and fight the regular rise of smuggling (El Zaidy 2019, 4). Beneath that framework, Italy’s parliament accepted the donation of 12 patrol vessels to the LCG to extend interceptions of migrant boats making an attempt to succeed in Europe (El Zaidy 2019, 10). Furthermore, the EU skilled 237 LCG officers to assist Italian efforts (El Zaidy 2019). Danilo Toninelli, Italy’s Transport Minister, said in 2018 that the assist to Libya given by Italy to forestall boats reaching Europe was price €2.5 million and included the 12 boats and funds for coaching and sustaining the LCG officers (El Zaidy 2019). The events to the MoU additionally agreed on the necessity to discover speedy options to the issue of ‘unlawful’ migration to Europe, whereas respecting worldwide human rights treaties (Moreno-Lax and Guiffre, 8). Italy agreed to fund the institution of ‘reception’ facilities in Libya, the place migrants and refugees will stay detained till they settle for to be voluntarily returned to their house nations (Moreno-Lax and Guiffre, 8). Counting on EU funds, Italy agreed to offer technical and financial assist to Libyan businesses accountable for the combat towards ‘unlawful’ migration, together with LCG (Moreno-Lax and Guiffre, 8).

The coaching and help offered by the EU and Italy are geared toward enabling Libya to intercept boats of migrants and refugees making an attempt to succeed in Europe (Moreno-Lax and Guiffre, 8). Since all these measures had been put in place, the quantity of individuals reaching Europe through the Central Mediterranean lessened significantly (El Zaidy 2019, 11). Since then, migrants proceed to try the crossing from Libya, however they’re both intercepted by the LCG or pushed again by Italian or European authorities at sea (El Zaidy 2019). All migrants returned to Libya by the LCG encounter indefinite detention and different inhumane or in poor health remedy in detention facilities (El Zaidy 2019, 15), as described within the introduction of this chapter.

Actus Reus: The Materials Contribution

The EU’s choice to finish Mare Nostrum in 2014 led to a gross enhance in drownings (Rettman, 2019). Triton coated an space as much as 30 nautical miles from the Italian shoreline of Lampedusa, leaving round 40 nautical miles of key misery space off the coast of Libya uncovered (Rettman 2019).The primary mass drowning occurred in January 2015 and the general loss of life charge elevated by 30 p.c within the following years (Rettman 2019).

The EU additionally gives assist to the LCG to allow it to intercept migrants and refugees at sea, after which they’re taken again to Libya the place they face arbitrary detention, inhuman, and degrading circumstances and the danger of torture, sexual violence, extortion, and compelled labor (Rettman 2019). In line with Human Rights Watch, the rise in interceptions by the LCG led to a rise within the variety of migrants and refugees detained in Libya (Human Rights Watch 2019). In July 2018, there have been between 8,000-10,000 individuals in official detention facilities, up from 5,200 in April 2018 (Human Rights Watch 2019). Regardless of the chaos and harmful state of affairs within the North African nation, the EU’s goal of returning migrants and refugees to Libya uncovered an extra 40,000 individuals to crimes amounting to crimes towards humanity between 2016 and 2018 (Human Rights Watch 2019).

Mens Rea: The Psychological Aspect

It’s clear that EU brokers have information of the crimes to which migrants are uncovered in Libya and are equally conscious of the truth that these crimes are direct results of their acts and omissions. Regarding actions at sea, an inner report by Frontex in August 2014 warned that the withdrawal of naval belongings from the realm beforehand coated by Mare Nostrum would probably lead to the next variety of fatalities (Rettman 2019). And nonetheless, Triton’s targets had been by no means tailored to look and rescue. As well as, the humanitarian group Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), mentioned in 2019 the results of European containment and pushback insurance policies within the context of Libya. MSF argued that dismantling search and rescue capacities at sea and sponsoring LCG efforts to intercept migrants at sea and forcibly return them to Libya was leading to a rise of individuals’s possibilities of dying at sea in addition to being subjected to trafficking, abduction, detention, and extortion (MSF, 2019).

The most recent UNSC report from April 2020, clearly helps that assertion (UNSC 2020). The Secretary-Basic states, ‘Libya can’t be thought-about a spot of security for the disembarkation of refugees and migrants rescued at sea… Nevertheless, refugees and migrants continued to be disembarked in Libya, primarily after interception by the Libyan coastguard’. The report reads that ‘the persevering with systematic and arbitrary detention of refugees and migrants who disembark in Libya is alarming’ (UNSC 2020), and that ‘circumstances inside detention centres stay appalling’ (UNSC 2020). UNSMIL has additionally documented the various methods by which the LCG poses a direct risk to migrants’ lives by inter alia demonstrating reckless conduct, utilizing firearms towards migrants on boats and displaying bodily violence (UNSMIL and OHCHR 2018). Within the report, there are accounts of incidents, involving aggressive conduct towards migrants and refugees, which ‘usually are not remoted’ (UNSMIL and OHCHR 2018).

Concerning the terrible circumstances in detention facilities, senior EU officers are conscious of the crimes migrants face when detained in Libya. In November 2017, Dimitri Avramopoulos, the EU’s Migration Commissioner, mentioned that ‘we’re all acutely aware of the appalling and degrading circumstances by which some migrants are held in Libya’ (Human Rights Watch 2019). In line with Human Rights Watch, he and different senior EU officers have repeatedly asserted that the EU needs to enhance circumstances in Libyan detention facilities in recognition of grave and widespread abuses (Human Rights Watch 2019). Nevertheless, interviews with detainees, detention middle employees, Libyan officers, and humanitarian actors revealed that EU efforts to enhance circumstances and remedy in official detention facilities have had a negligible affect (Human Rights Watch 2019).

Apart from the above stories from UN particular rapporteurs, Frontex, and human rights organizations, the European Court docket of Human Rights (ECHR) additionally made clear its place to Italy concerning its insurance policies in the direction of Libya. Within the case Hirsi Jamma and Others v. Italy, the Grand Chamber of the ECHR unanimously dominated that Italy’s push again operations desiring to return migrants and refugees at sea to Libya amounted to a violation of the prohibition of torture and different inhuman or degrading remedy beneath Article 3 of the European Conference on the Safety of Human Rights and Elementary Freedoms (ECHR) as a result of Italy ‘knew or ought to have recognized’ that migrants and refugees can be uncovered to remedy in breach of the ECHR in Libya (Euopean Court docket of Human Rights 2012). However, that judgement has not deterred EU member states to proceed implementing the identical practices.


Nils Melzer detailed in his 2018 report that the widespread crimes towards humanity dedicated towards migrants in Libya have a causal connection to sure exterior insurance policies (UNGA 2018, 16). The EU insurance policies in Libya appear to suit that definition. By refusing search and rescue, and funding and coaching the LCG, EU brokers are offering means for the fee of crimes towards migrants in Libya. Subsequently, felony duty for crimes towards humanity can emerge from these actions.

The investigation into the state of affairs in Libya by the Workplace of the Prosecutor of the ICC centered on the crimes towards humanity of homicide, imprisonment, torture, persecution, and different inhumane acts, allegedly dedicated by Libyan brokers (Mann, Morena-Lax, and Shatz 2018). Nevertheless, if the ICC intends to analyze crimes towards humanity occurring in Libya, it can not achieve this with out analyzing the position of the EU and its officers. As Itamar Mann, Violeta Moreno-Lax, and Omer Shatz clarify, the ‘choice to additionally examine the collusion of European actors would extra adequately tackle the whole state of affairs, its systemic nature and programmed design’ (2018). In line with them, any investigation that doesn’t take into accounts the involvement of EU brokers will simply showcase ‘the consequence slightly that the reason for struggling, in a system that traps migrants in a vicious circle of extra management, extra hazard, and extra dependence on facilitators to flee life-threatening perils’ (Mann, Morena-Lax, and Shatz 2018). Nonetheless at the moment, nearly on a weekly foundation, we hear of incidents within the Central Mediterranean: European coastguards refusing to answer misery calls at sea, leaving lots of of individuals drifting at sea for a number of days, or secretly organizing privatized pushback operations to Libya (Migreurop 2020).

In line with the case regulation and definitions of aiding and abetting, there’s sufficient proof to justify the emergence of particular person felony duty from the EU’s collaboration with Libya. Nevertheless, that doesn’t imply that the Prosecutor of the ICC would perform the investigation. Beneath the Rome Statute, the ICC wouldn’t have jurisdiction to analyze if EU member states determined to analyze domestically. Furthermore, the Prosecutor might, beneath Article 53, determine to not pursue the investigation if there are substantial causes to consider that it could not serve the pursuits of justice, even after taking into consideration the gravity of the crime and pursuits of victims (ICC 1998). If, however, the ICC determined to analyze EU officers, a wider scope and proof can be taken under consideration, in addition to different modes of legal responsibility, as described in Shatz and Branco’s communication to the Prosecutor of the ICC (Shatz and Branco2019).

Final however not least, as Itamar Mann, Violeta Moreno-Lax, and Omer Shatz state, a discovering that ‘European actors had been concerned in such crimes… would present that militia and trafficking brokers are sometimes working on the service (or for the last word profit) of European principals, exactly for the aim of stopping poor and black populations from entry to European sources of wealth’ (Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018). Together with EU officers within the investigation would additionally set a precedent for different circumstances of ‘contactless management’ or border externalization insurance policies, like these of Australia and america (Ferlick, Kysel and Podkul 2016), exhibiting that these insurance policies may be deemed lively types of abuse the place the tip impact is identical (Mann, Moreno-Lax and Shatz 2018).


Ambos, Kai. 2013. ‘Prison Duty, Modes Of’. Max Planck Encyclopedias of Worldwide Regulation [MPIL].

Eisinger, Judit. 2015. ‘Operation Triton: Europe Blind On Immigration Actuality’. Le Journal Worldwide – Archives.

El Zaidy, Zakariya. 2019. ‘EU Migration Coverage In the direction of Libya: A Coverage Of Conflicting Pursuits’. Library of The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

European Fee. 2017. ‘Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council Migration on the Central Mediterranean Route Managing Flows, Saving Lives’. EUR-Lex.

European Court docket of Human Rights. 2012. Case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy (Judgement) ECtHR 27765/09 (23 February 2012).

Ferlick, Invoice, Ian Kysel and Jennifer Podkul. 2016. ‘The Affect of Externalization of Migration Controls on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Different Migrants’. Human Rights Watch.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, Hathaway, James C.. 2014. ‘Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’. Regulation & Economics Working Papers. 106.

Human Rights Watch. 2019. ‘No Escape From Hell: EU Insurance policies Contribute To Abuse Of Migrants In Libya’. Human Rights Watch.

ICC. 1998. Rome Statute of the Worldwide Prison Court docket (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into drive 1 July 2002) 2187 UNTS 90 (Rome Statute).

ICC. 2011. ‘Libya: State of affairs in Libya (ICC-01/11)’. 2011. Worldwide Prison Court docket.

ICC. 2017. ‘Worldwide Prison Court docket Might Examine Migrant-Associated Crimes in Libya, Safety Council Informed’. UN Information.

Worldwide Regulation Fee. 2001. ‘Draft Articles on Duty of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, With Commentaries’. United Nations.

Worldwide Regulation Fee. 2010.  Draft Articles on Duty of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, November 2001, Complement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.IV.E.1.

Knoops, Geert-Jan Alexander. 2014. An Introduction to The Regulation of Worldwide Prison Tribunals: A Comparative Examine. 2nd ed. Worldwide Prison Regulation Sequence, Quantity: 7.

Mann, Itamar, Violeta Moreno-Lax, and Omer Shatz. 2018. ‘Time to Examine European Brokers for Crimes Towards Migrants In Libya’. EJIL: Speak! Weblog of The European Journal of Worldwide Regulation.

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). 2019. ‘Buying and selling in struggling: detention, exploitation and abuse in Libya’. Médecins Sans Frontières.

Migreurop. 2020. ‘Deaths in The Mediterranean Are Not Inevitable!’. Migreurop, Observatoire Des Frontières.

Moreno-Lax, Violeta, and Mariagiulia Giuffré. 2017. ‘The Rise Of Consensual Containment: From “Contactless Management” To “Contactless Duty”’. SSRN Digital Journal.

Pillai, Priya. 2019. ‘The EU and Migrant Detention In Libya: Complicity Beneath the Microscope Lastly?’. Opinio Juris.

Rettman, Andrew. 2019. ‘EU Responsible Of Libya Migrant “Tragedy”, ICC Lawsuit Says’. Euobserver.

Shatz, O. and Juan Branco. 2019. ‘EU Migration Insurance policies within the Central Mediterranean and Libya (2014–2019)’. Communication to the Workplace of the Prosecutor of the Worldwide Prison Court docket Pursuant to the Article 15 of the Rome Statute.  

Tazzioli, Martina. 2016. ‘Border displacements. Difficult the politics of rescue between Mare Nostrum and Triton’, Migration Research, Quantity 4, Subject 1, March: 1–19.

UN Information. 2017. ‘African Migrants Reportedly Being Offered In ‘Slave Markets’ In Libya, UN Company Warns’. UN Information.,of%20outrages%E2%80%9D%20in%20the%20country.

United Nations. 1993. Statute of the Worldwide Prison Tribunal for the previous Yugoslavia, twenty fifth Might 1993 (UN Doc S/RES/827[1993]).

United Nations. 1994. Statute of the Worldwide Prison Tribunal for Rwanda, eighth November 1994 (UN Doc S/RES/955[1994]).

United Nations. 2000. Case of Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić aka ‘Dule’ (Judgment) ICTY-94-1 (26 January 2000).

UNGA. 2017. ‘Report of the Particular Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on extrajudicial, abstract or arbitrary executions’, Established by UNGA Res 71/198 (15 August 2017) 72nd Session (2017) UN Doc A/72/335.

UNGA. 2018. ‘Report of the Particular Rapporteur on torture and different merciless, inhuman or degrading remedy or punishment’, Established by HRC Res 34/19 (23 November 2018) thirty seventh Session (2018) UN Doc A/HRC/37/50.

UNSC. 2017. ‘Ultimate report back to the Panel of Consultants on Libya established pursuant to decision 1973 (2011)’, (1 June 2017) UN Doc S/2017/466.

UNSC. 2020. ‘Implementation of decision 2491 (2019), report of the Secretary-Basic’. UN Doc S/2020/275.

UNSMIL and OHCHR. 2018. ‘Determined and Harmful: Report on the human rights state of affairs of migrants and refugees in Libya’ (2018) UNSMIL.

Vij, Vanshika. 2013. ‘Particular person Prison Duty Beneath Aiding and Abetting after the Particular Path Requirement within the Taylor and Perišić Circumstances’, Die Friedens-Warte 88, no. 3/4: 157–75.

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations