The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the record of misleading methods is the usage of a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.

Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The actual fact is, the PCR take a look at isn’t designed to be used as a diagnostic device because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones.1

This can be a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses should not interchangeable when it comes to infectivity. If in case you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can’t unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome individuals testing “constructive.”

The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Take a look at Outcomes

The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re decoding outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. As a consequence of its tiny measurement, it should be amplified to change into discernible. Every spherical of amplification is known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab is known as a cycle threshold (CT).

The upper the CT, the larger the danger that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no risk to you or anybody else.

Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Medical Infectious Illnesses revealed that if you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or greater, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive price.

But, a take a look at referred to as the Corman-Drosten paper and checks advisable by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate working PCR checks at a CT of 40.9

The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive checks, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.

Many at the moment are questioning whether or not this was finished on function to crash the worldwide economic system and present cowl for the implementation of what is referred to as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s belongings.

Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as total mortality statistics have remained steady in 2020 and in keeping with earlier years.12,13,14

In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness isn’t killing an extra variety of individuals. The identical variety of individuals would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC information15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only real trigger on the demise certificates.

“For deaths with circumstances or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further circumstances or causes per demise,” the CDC acknowledged, and any a type of comorbidities may have killed these individuals even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.

For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used

Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is not any scarcity of knowledge at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in gentle of all these information tells us they are not taken with getting an correct image of the an infection price.

For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Illnesses confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at should be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.

By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a constructive PCR take a look at being a true constructive shrinks to zero.

Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic overview17 revealed within the journal of Medical Infectious Illnesses assessed the findings of 29 completely different research — all of which had been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.

As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing stay virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a constructive take a look at really being as a result of presence of stay (and infectious) virus.

“Two research reported the percentages of stay virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to establish any stay viruses in circumstances the place a constructive PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, with the intention to produce stay virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.

So, to summarize, you probably have signs of COVID-19 and take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or greater, then you might be prone to be contaminated and infectious.

Nevertheless, in the event you do not need signs, but take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or greater, then it’s possible a false constructive and also you pose no threat to others as you are unlikely to hold any stay virus. The truth is, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even in the event you take a look at constructive with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or greater.

Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Take a look at

The video above consists of a number of interviews with specialists who’ve overtly criticized the usage of PCR testing to diagnose infections akin to COVID-19. These embrace:

The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the take a look at for different infections, akin to HIV, however died in August 2019, a couple of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)

Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer

Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Middle for Proof-Based mostly Drugs

Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology

Clare Craig, a guide pathologist

Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned skilled on the PCR take a look at

In 1993, Mullis spoke about the usage of the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you possibly can detect, nevertheless it can not inform you whether or not these particles really pose a threat to your well being.

He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you possibly can basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all types, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply lifeless particles that pose no threat.

Bustin factors out that if you get a constructive outcome utilizing a CT of 35 or greater, you are trying on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The chance of that inflicting a well being downside is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it roughly ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting lifeless nucelotides. No stay virus could be detected at CTs that top.

Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based mostly

November 30, 2020, a group of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a overview18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual internationally.

In keeping with Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key offender within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.

The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted on account of “deadly errors,”24 certainly one of which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was accessible. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.

The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer overview. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who at the moment are demanding the paper’s retraction, acknowledged:25

“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.

When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.

Within the fish market, it is like providing you with a couple of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It might be any fish … Pay attention, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.

They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you place it in … That is principally a pc virus.

There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There’s nothing on the heart of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …

There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they mentioned: ‘Here is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.

The conclusion of the overview reads, partially:26

“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to enormously decrease human value and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the most effective curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is obvious. Within the face of all of the great PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There’s not a lot of a selection left within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability.”

The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The examine evaluated information from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Might 14 and June 1, 2020.

A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 individuals with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, once they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no stay virus was present in any of them!

Antibody Exams Are Equally Unreliable

Antibody checks are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. If in case you have antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that might be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus sooner or later prior to now. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at may end up constructive you probably have antibodies in opposition to widespread chilly viruses.

June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses answerable for the widespread chilly can lead to a constructive COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even in the event you’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28

The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the widespread chilly additionally seem to offer some basic and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.

One such examine,32,33 revealed Might 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell degree, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.

In keeping with the authors, this means there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘widespread chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, in the event you’ve recovered from a typical chilly brought on by a selected coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate if you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you proof against COVID-19.

One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in probably the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a unfavourable antibody take a look at does not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might really be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.

In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, difficulty of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a few of the accessible information, noting that:

“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, you will need to keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they aren’t.

Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at varied inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which possible mirror present circumstances in america and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”

antibody testing for covid-19

Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they advisable that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a means that displays the native inhabitants prevalence primarily based on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive price,” as this info “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making concerning earlier an infection and return to work or faculty.”

At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that information of their reporting, and the means issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.

Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off

If the huge majority of people that take a look at constructive for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out understanding it, and which 90% are in a position to remove with out remedy?

The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital assets wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting individuals to die on account of lack of medical care.

These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even decreasing the variety of individuals that might finally get contaminated. They actually had been by no means meant to stop all demise. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not attainable, underneath any circumstance.

Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the most effective form — would stop it from reemerging. But the aim posts preserve shifting as we go alongside.

Two-week lockdowns become months in some areas. Finally, we had been advised every part would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine turned accessible. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been advised we might nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns effectively into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?

The one rational motive for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering primarily based on a mix of wildly manipulated information and flawed checks.

Other than PCR testing information, there is not any proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and folks have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths on account of it.36,37,38 The full mortality for 2020 is regular.

So, except we suppose we must always shut down the world and cease residing as a result of individuals die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is not any motive to close down the world as a result of some individuals occur to die from COVID-19.

What You Can Do

The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals courtroom dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Due to this fact, “any enforced quarantine primarily based on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The courtroom additionally famous that forcing wholesome individuals to self-isolate might be a violation of their basic proper to liberty.

As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, contemplate:

  • Turning off mainstream media information and turning to impartial specialists — do the analysis. Learn via the science.
  • Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the details on PCR testing, so you possibly can clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
  • In case you are a medical skilled, particularly in the event you’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from impartial specialists.
  • Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
  • Be part of a bunch so that you just can have assist — Examples of teams fashioned to combat in opposition to authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a bunch campaigning for reopening faculties and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Okay., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. group of attorneys, docs, enterprise homeowners and oldsters who’re preventing to guard freedom and liberty.