OK of us, right now you might be in for an actual deal with. We now have introduced most of the items beforehand, however it will assist put them within the correct perspective. That’s the part we’re in now. We now have the info, we simply want to grasp what they imply and interpret them correctly.

This can be a actually necessary article. It catalyzed my understanding of what the heck is occurring. The info are apparent; all the response to the global pandemic was facilitated by the World Well being Group. Their suggestions have been adopted lock-step by nearly each authorities on Earth.

Nobody will dispute this reality. The subsequent information level is: Who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, however the proof is fairly clear and stable. It’s Invoice Gates, who grew to become the WHO’s biggest funder when then-President Trump eliminated U.S. assist final yr.

What does Gates have to learn from controlling the WHO? How about one of the best funding he ever made, with many tens of billions of {dollars} working by way of his “nonprofit” GAVI Vaccine Alliance? The maniacal suppression and censorship of any cheap pure different for COVID-19 makes good sense now.

These pure therapies, nebulized hydrogen peroxide being one of the best instance, can be severe competitors for the vaccines. If everybody knew that these cures have been available, extremely efficient and virtually free, who would threat their life for a vaccine? Nearly nobody. All of it makes good sense.

With that framework, benefit from the data our group has compiled that expands on this common idea. Every single day we’re placing the items of the puzzle collectively, and the extra items we match collectively, the earlier you will note the larger image. Extra to return within the very close to future.

WHO Insider Speaks Out

In July 2020, 4 German attorneys based the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1).2,3 Within the video above, the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4 interviews Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, about what she found about Invoice Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.

Stuckelberger has served as deputy director of the Swiss nationwide program of ageing for the reason that Nineteen Nineties, and is the president of the WHO-funded Geneva Worldwide Community on Ageing.

In response to her bio,5 she “is an internationally acknowledged professional on points associated to evaluating scientific analysis for policymakers, specifically in well being and innovation evaluation, pandemic and emergency administration coaching and in optimizing particular person and inhabitants well being and well-being.”

She’s additionally a revealed creator, with a dozen books to her credit score, in addition to greater than 180 scientific articles, coverage papers and governmental and worldwide stories. Stuckelberger factors out that a lot of the analysis accomplished was and nonetheless is very politicized and primarily accomplished to assist and justify political selections.

For the previous 20 years, since 2000, she’s been concerned with public well being on the WHO, and was a part of their analysis ethics committee for 4 years. In 2009, she bought concerned with the WHO’s worldwide well being rules.

Stuckelberger factors out that the entire function of WHO’s worldwide well being rules is to arrange member states to be prepared for a pandemic, to have the ability to not solely stop outbreaks but in addition reply swiftly when an outbreak happens. Nonetheless, the WHO has truly been actively stopping and undermining this pandemic preparedness coaching.

The Middle of Corruption

In response to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is on the coronary heart of the corruption, largely because of it being the headquarters for GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, based by Invoice Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was acknowledged as a global establishment and granted complete blanket immunity.6

As defined by Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of many German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee members, GAVI has “certified diplomatic immunity,” which is odd, contemplating the group has no political energy that might warrant diplomatic immunity. Odder nonetheless is that GAVI’s immunity clauses transcend even that of diplomats. GAVI’s immunity covers all features of engagement, together with legal enterprise dealings.

“They will do no matter they need,” Stuckelberger says, with out repercussions. The police, for instance, are barred from conducting an investigation and amassing proof if GAVI have been to be implicated in a legal investigation. “It’s stunning,” she says. GAVI can be fully tax exempt, which Stuckelberger notes is “very unusual.”

Primarily, GAVI is a nongovernmental group (NGO) that’s allowed to function with out paying any taxes, whereas additionally having complete immunity for something they do flawed, willfully or in any other case. That is slightly unprecedented, and raises a complete host of questions. It’s notably disturbing in gentle of proof Stuckelberger claims to have discovered displaying that GAVI is “directing, as a company entity, the WHO.”

Moreover, paperwork cited by Stuckelberger present the WHO has assumed what quantities to dictatorial energy over the entire world. The director common has the only real energy to make selections — together with selections about which assessments or pandemic medicines to use — that each one member states should then obey.

The Nation-State of Gates

What’s extra, Stuckelberger found that, in 2017, Gates truly requested to be a part of the WHO’s govt board — like a member state — ostensibly as a result of he provides them a lot cash. Certainly, his funding exceeds that of many particular person member states.

Like Stuckelberger says, that is actually unimaginable — the concept that a single man would have the identical energy and affect over the WHO as that of a whole nation. It’s a brazen energy seize, to say the least. Whereas there’s no proof that Gates was ever formally granted the standing of a member state, one wonders whether or not he doesn’t have it unofficially.

One factor that raises Stuckelberger’s suspicion is the truth that Swissmedic, the Meals and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered right into a three-way contract settlement with Gates and the WHO. “That is irregular,” she says.

Primarily, in abstract, it seems that when he didn’t get voted in as a one-man nation state, Gates created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, basically inserting him on par with the WHO. As talked about earlier, regardless of the director common of the WHO says, goes. They’ve successfully turned international well being safety right into a dictatorship.

The query is, is Gates the true energy backstage? Does he inform the director common what to do? While you look again over the previous yr, it appears Gates has typically been the primary to announce what the world must do to deal with the pandemic, after which the WHO comes out with an similar message, which is then parroted by world leaders, roughly verbatim.

As famous by Fuellmich, it’s turning into clear that many private-public partnerships have been hijacked by the non-public aspect — they usually’re immune from legal responsibility. “This has bought to cease,” he says.

An entire evaluation and overhaul of the United Nations, which established the WHO, can be required because the U.N. has accomplished nothing to forestall or rein in undemocratic and criminal activity. As famous by Fuellmich, we in all probability must rethink whether or not we even want them.

Modified Definition of Pandemic Allowed Well being Dictatorship

Within the interview, in addition they spotlight the WHO’s function in setting the stage for a worldwide well being dictatorship by altering the definition of “pandemic.” The WHO’s authentic definition, pre-2009, of a pandemic was:7,8

“… when a brand new influenza virus seems towards which the human inhabitants has no immunity, leading to a number of, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with huge numbers of deaths and sickness.”

The important thing portion of that definition is “huge numbers of deaths and sickness.” This definition was modified within the month main as much as the 2009 swine flu pandemic.

The change was a easy however substantial one: They merely eliminated the severity and excessive mortality standards, leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a illness.”9 This swap in definition is why COVID-19 was and nonetheless is promoted as a pandemic though it, at no level, has induced any extra mortality.10,11,12

We now have loads of information displaying the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.13,14,15,16,17 It could be totally different in phrases of signs and issues, however the precise lethality is in regards to the similar. But we’re informed the worth we should all pay to maintain ourselves and others protected from this virus is the relinquishing of our civil rights and liberties.

Briefly, by eradicating the standards of extreme sickness inflicting excessive morbidity, leaving geographically widespread an infection as the one standards for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world have been capable of bamboozle the worldwide inhabitants into giving up our lives and livelihoods.

WHO Rewrites Science by Altering Definition of Herd Immunity

The WHO has additionally radically altered the definition of “herd immunity.” Herd immunity happens when sufficient folks purchase immunity to an infectious illness such that it may well now not unfold extensively in the neighborhood. When the quantity vulnerable is low sufficient to forestall epidemic progress, herd immunity is claimed to have been reached.

Previous to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved through publicity to and restoration from an infectious illness. Finally, as vaccination grew to become widespread, the idea of herd immunity developed to embrace not solely the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior sickness, but in addition the momentary vaccine-acquired immunity that may happen after vaccination.

Nonetheless, in October 2020, the WHO upended science as we all know it, revising this well-established idea in an Orwellian transfer that completely removes pure an infection from the equation.

As late as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on considered one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was in step with the widely-accepted idea that has been the commonplace for infectious ailments for many years. Right here’s what it initially mentioned:18

“Herd immunity is the oblique safety from an infectious illness that occurs when a inhabitants is immune both by way of vaccination or immunity developed by way of earlier an infection.”

The up to date definition of herd immunity, which appeared in October 2020, learn as follows:19

“‘Herd immunity’, often known as ‘inhabitants immunity’, is an idea used for vaccination, through which a inhabitants might be shielded from a sure virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by defending folks from a virus, not by exposing them to it.

Vaccines practice our immune programs to create proteins that struggle illness, often called ‘antibodies’, simply as would occur once we are uncovered to a illness however — crucially — vaccines work with out making us sick.

Vaccinated persons are shielded from getting the illness in query and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. With herd immunity, the overwhelming majority of a inhabitants are vaccinated, decreasing the general quantity of virus capable of unfold in the entire inhabitants.”

After public — and little doubt embarrassing — backlash, the WHO revised its definition once more December 31, 2020, to once more embrace the point out of pure an infection, whereas nonetheless emphasizing vaccine-acquired immunity. It now reads:20

“’Herd immunity’, often known as ‘inhabitants immunity,’ is the oblique safety from an infectious illness that occurs when a inhabitants is immune both by way of vaccination or immunity developed by way of earlier an infection.

WHO helps attaining ‘herd immunity’ by way of vaccination, not by permitting a illness to unfold by way of any section of the inhabitants, as this may lead to pointless instances and deaths.

Herd immunity towards COVID-19 ought to be achieved by defending folks by way of vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the illness.”

WHO’s Suggestion of PCR Check ‘Deliberately Prison’

Stuckelberger additionally shocks the Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee by declaring that twice — December 7, 2020,21,22 and January 13, 202123 — the WHO issued medical alerts for PCR testing, warning that use of excessive cycle thresholds (CT) will produce excessive charges of false positives, that the CT worth ought to be reported to the well being care supplier and that take a look at outcomes be thought-about together with medical observations, well being historical past and different epidemiological data.

But for the reason that starting of the pandemic, it has pushed PCR testing as one of the best ways to detect and diagnose an infection. This, she says, makes it deliberately legal. The January 13, 202124,25 medical product alert was, by the way, posted on-line January 20, 2021, mere hours after Joe Biden’s inauguration because the President of the US.

On this alert, the WHO burdened that the “CT wanted to detect virus is inversely proportional to the affected person’s viral load,” and that “The place take a look at outcomes don’t correspond with the medical presentation, a brand new specimen ought to be taken and retested.”

It additionally reminds customers that “illness prevalence alters the predictive worth of take a look at outcomes,” in order that “as illness prevalence decreases, the danger of false constructive will increase.” The alert goes on to clarify:26

“Which means that the likelihood that an individual who has a constructive end result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is actually contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, no matter the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an help for analysis, due to this fact, well being care suppliers should think about any lead to mixture with timing of sampling, specimen kind, assay specifics, medical observations, affected person historical past, confirmed standing of any contacts, and epidemiological data.”

Taking a affected person’s signs under consideration and utilizing a scientifically defensible CT rely ought to have been routine apply from the start. It simply didn’t match the geopolitical narrative. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the WHO has advisable utilizing a CT of 45,27,28,29 which ensures an infinite variety of false positives, and due to this fact “instances.” This alone is how they stored the pandemic fearmongering going.

The scientific consensus has lengthy been that something over 35 CTs renders the PCR take a look at ineffective,30,31,32 because the accuracy will likely be a measly 3% — 97% are false positives.33 By lastly recommending decrease CTs and extra exact standards for analysis, the WHO engineered an assured finish to the caseload at a desired time. Coincidentally, the subsequent day, January 21, 2021, President Biden introduced he would reinstate the U.S.’ monetary assist for the WHO.34

Time to Put an Finish to the International Well being Mafia

The WHO was created as a specialised company of the U.N., established in 1948 to additional worldwide cooperation for improved public well being circumstances. It was given a broad mandate beneath its structure to advertise the attainment of “the very best attainable degree of well being” by all peoples.

It’s now past dispute that the WHO is past compromised. Due to its funding — a massive portion of which comes from the “one-man nation-state of Gates” — it fails to finish its authentic mandate. Worse, WHO serves company masters and thru its dictatorial powers is actually destroying, not bettering, the well being of the world.

In June 2010, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Meeting (PACE) issued a report35 on the WHO’s dealing with of the 2009 pandemic of novel influenza A (H1N1), which included the advice to make use of a fast-tracked vaccine that ended up inflicting incapacity and loss of life across the world.

PACE concluded “the dealing with of the pandemic by the WHO, EU well being companies and nationwide governments led to a waste of enormous sums of public cash, and unjustified scares and fears in regards to the well being dangers confronted by the European public.”36

Particularly, PACE discovered “overwhelming proof that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug trade had influenced the group’s decision-making — a declare echoed by different investigators as nicely.37,38,39,40,41

The Meeting made various suggestions, together with higher transparency, higher governance of public well being, safeguards towards undue affect by vested pursuits, public funding of impartial analysis, and final however not least, for the media to “keep away from sensationalism and scaremongering within the public well being area.”42

None of these suggestions have been adopted and, if something, the WHO’s mismanagement of public well being, because of private-public partnerships with NGOs comparable to GAVI, has solely worsened. Different stories, two revealed in 201543,44 and one in 2017,45 additionally highlighted the WHO’s failures and lack of acceptable management throughout the 2013 by way of 2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

Whereas the WHO is acknowledged as being uniquely suited to hold out key capabilities vital in a worldwide pandemic, specialists on the London Faculty of Hygiene and Tropical Drugs, and the Harvard International Well being Institute, have identified, years in the past, that the WHO has eroded a lot belief that radical reforms can be required earlier than it may well assume an authoritative function.

But right here we’re, nonetheless, and no reforms ever occurred. As an alternative, the corruption festered and metastasized, and the WHO changed into an influence hub for the technocratic deep state that seeks to assume energy and management over all nations.

As famous by Fuellmich, we in all probability must take an extended onerous have a look at the WHO and the U.N., and determine whether or not they’re even price saving. At naked minimal, the disproportionate affect by non-public vested pursuits, disguised as NGOs comparable to GAVI, have to be totally investigated and routed out.